Task Decomposition for Multiple Coding Agents
Split software work into independently verifiable outcomes, stabilize shared contracts, model producer-consumer dependencies, and launch only the coding-agent tasks that are genuinely ready.
Notes on AGENTS.md, context engineering, and the failure modes that taught us each lesson.
View repository-harness on GitHub Start with agent-ready repositories
Split software work into independently verifiable outcomes, stabilize shared contracts, model producer-consumer dependencies, and launch only the coding-agent tasks that are genuinely ready.
Configure Codex with layered AGENTS.md instructions, trusted project settings, sandbox and approval boundaries, executable rules, repository skills, MCP servers, and clean-session proof.
Use CLAUDE.md as the Claude Code entry point, import portable AGENTS.md instructions, scope local rules, share project settings, enforce hard boundaries with permissions and hooks, and verify everything in a clean session.
Modern Cursor supports both portable AGENTS.md files and version-controlled .mdc Project Rules. Learn how to split shared repository truth, scoped Cursor workflows, Cloud Agent setup, and executable policy.
Resolve textual, contract, generated-output, behavior, migration, and authority conflicts with stable checkpoints, explicit ownership, source-first repair, and combined proof.
Combine Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other agent branches in dependency order with contract gates, rollback checkpoints, combined validation, and reproducible evidence.
Run Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other coding agents in isolated worktrees with bounded scopes, stable checkpoints, dependency-aware integration, and safe cleanup.
Transfer coding work through a stable checkpoint, explicit contract changes, reproducible evidence, honest omissions, residual risks, and one verifiable next action.
Use one canonical repository contract, thin tool adapters, bounded task scopes, isolated worktrees, and evidence-based integration across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Copilot.
Tài liệu dành cho người mới tiếp cận codex-room-setup: thành phần nào chịu trách nhiệm việc gì, một thay đổi đi qua hệ thống ra sao, và nên điều chỉnh ở đâu.
Install an isolated Supervisor, Lead, Peer, and Review Codex room through Paseo: share one operator login, keep four runtimes apart, and leave ~/.codex under the operator’s control.
A low-risk migration sequence for adding repository routing, bounded tasks, source-of-truth maps, validation contracts, evidence handoffs, and safe recovery to an existing codebase.
Translate OpenAI’s agent-first harness engineering idea into vendor-independent repository context, bounded tasks, executable feedback loops, durable state, and evidence-based handoffs.
Nine reusable patterns turn repository context into an operating system for agent work: routing, task boundaries, decision memory, proof, handoff, checkpoints, and safe recovery.
Stop calling every bad agent session a hallucination. This taxonomy traces ten repeatable failure modes to the first wrong decision, the missing controller, and a durable repository repair.
A better prompt can rescue one task. Durable repository context improves every task that follows. Learn what belongs in prompts, what belongs in the repo, and how to migrate repeated corrections.
A coding agent draws from task, session, repository, decision-history, and model context. This diagnostic framework shows which layer failed—and where the fix belongs.
See how repository-harness evolved AGENTS.md from a 75-line operating manual into a 32-line routing layer with explicit authority, planning, validation, and handoff rules.
Code quality and agent-readiness overlap, but they solve different problems. Learn what AI coding agents need beyond clean code, tests, and maintainable architecture.
A practical audit checklist for finding the gaps that make Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other coding agents fail inside a repository.
Backend and frontend repositories need different AGENTS.md instructions. This guide shows what to include for APIs, services, UI apps, design systems, and full-stack projects.
AGENTS.md is not a one-time setup file. This guide shows when to update it, what to review, and how to keep coding-agent instructions aligned with tests, architecture, tools, and releases.
Most AGENTS.md files fail because they are too vague, stale, or unverifiable. Here are 10 mistakes that break Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other coding agents — and how to fix each one.
Ten real AGENTS.md files from public open-source repositories, each annotated for what works, what does not, and what to copy. The fastest way to learn AGENTS.md is to read the best ones.
A current, official-docs comparison of AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, Cursor Rules, Copilot instructions, GEMINI.md, Aider, and OpenCode — including discovery, precedence, and a one-contract migration plan.
Most coding-agent failures are not model failures. They are repo-context failures. Better prompts help. But repositories need instructions, architecture context, and validation rules.
Context engineering for coding agents means shaping the repo environment so agents receive durable, relevant context before they write code. Here is how to apply it.
Most AGENTS.md files nobody reads. Here is how to write one that coding agents actually use — specific, concise, and validated by real sessions.
An agent-ready repository gives coding agents the instructions, architecture context, validation rules, and decision history they need to make useful, reviewable changes.
A practical template for agent-ready repositories — copy and adapt for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and other coding agents.
A working harness combines tests, docs, scripts, conventions, fixtures, examples, and decision records.